Da fehlt aber schon ein wichtiger Zusatz aus den Ministerpräsidenten-Büros. Der lautet wie folgt: "Eine Hungersnot würde die Fortsetzung der Offensive gefährden".
Es geht hier explizit um die Fortsetzung des Genozids, nicht um humanitäre Hilfe wegen der Kritik oder einem akuten Anfall von Menschlichkeit in der israelischen Regierung. Die Begründung ist entscheidend, damit Menschen verstehen, was wirklich passiert und warum es passiert.
On this day in 1896, the U.S Supreme Court delivered its decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, establishing the “separate but equal” doctrine and authorizing discrimination by states.
This marked the formal beginning of Jim Crow Laws.
THREAD
https://x.com/AfricanArchives/status/1924140532416037292
#racism #slavery #whitesupremacy #law
@blackmastodon @BLKNewsNow @blackvoices @blackgirlnerds
#SettlerColonialism #tiktok #cdnpoli #usa #yemen
@socialsciences
@humanities
#education #dei #humanrights #africa
Welcome 
, European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (#ENNHRI) Board members and Working Group Chairs!
We are honoured to host you for the discussion of our next strategic plan. It will strengthen National Human Rights Institutions in #Europe in promoting and protecting the human rights of all.
Solidarity and cooperation make us strong!
With 100,000 people in The Hague to demonstrate for peace in Gaza. All dressed in red, to tell the Dutch government it had crossed a red line in its failure to address genocide.
We passed the Peace Palace, housing the International Court of Justice. And the 18th century lawyer in front of the Dutch Supreme Court had received a 
umbrella.
Trump Judge Rules It’s OK to Discriminate Against LGBTQ People
https://newrepublic.com/post/195375/trump-judge-ok-discriminate-lgbtq-people
Far-right Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk just rolled back LGBTQ rights to a massive degree.
Door Israëlische luchtaanvallen zijn zondag verspreid over #Gaza zeker 33 mensen gedood, meldt de burgerbescherming van het gebied. Van de slachtoffers was meer dan de helft kind.
Een woordvoerder vertelde dat 22 mensen werden gedood en zeker honderd anderen gewond raakten bij een aanval op een tentenkamp in het zuiden van Gaza. In de tenten verbleven ontheemde #Palestijnen. #Humanrights #war #genocide
Peru’s LGBTQ activists give Pope Leo a thumbs up, though others are wary
#LGBT #LGBTQ #LGBTrights #humanrights #LGBTQrights #Peru #Leo #PopeLeo #Catholics #RomanCatholics
https://76crimes.com/2025/05/15/perus-lgbtq-activists-give-pope-leo-a-thumbs-up-others-are-wary/
Canada’s elite are scapegoating migrants—and here’s why they’re wrong
#canada #immigration #scapegoating #haiti
#tiktok #cdnpoli #humanrights #dei #racism #quebec #toronto #montreal #vancouver #halifax #calgary #winnipeg #labor #union #democracy #migrants #refugees @politics
@socialsciences
@blackvoices
@blackmastodon @BLKNewsNow
#africa #housing #homelessness #economy #tech #capitalism #tariffs #china #palestine #tfw
Today I was looking for a term that covers both #HumanRights and #AnimalRights. I learned about #OneRights.
Read more about it here:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-19201-2.pdf#Chapterb978-3-031-19201-2_4
@EUCommission Therefore, it is of great importance that the EU bans #conversiontherapy which harms people and is named torture by the UN! It's against #HumanRights!
Here's the official petition - the last day, deadline! Please join, if you are *really* standing strong with #LGBTIQ+ communities: https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/initiatives/details/2024/000001_en
Here's more information about what this unscientific so-called inhumane "therapy" is: https://www.globalcitizen.org/de/content/what-is-conversion-therapy-lgbtq/
All that said, this does nothing to help the people who were already rendered to #ElSalvador illegally by the #Trump admin. That’s a separate case. Which is why this issue should be addressed in a #ClassAction as
argued yesterday before #SCOTUS.
Notably, #Kavanaugh issued a concurring opinion saying,
“I would prefer not to remand to the lower courts & further put off this Court’s final resolution of the critical legal issues. Rather,… I would grant certiorari, order prompt briefing, hold oral argument soon thereafter, and then resolve the legal issues.”
#SCOTUS sets up how the litigation will proceed.
The #Trump admin is BARRED from deporting people held in WDTX under the #AlienEnemiesAct pending #SupremeCourt review. The #5thCircuit is ordered to rule not just on #DueProcess, but ALSO on the #underlying merits of the #AEA proclamation.
The #SCOTUS majority ALSO preemptively makes clear (in response to #Alito's written #dissent), that the government cannot get around #ClassAction treatment by agreeing to give notice to the class plaintiffs.
In rejecting jurisdictional arguments raised by the dissent, they bolster the lawsuits challenging the #AlienEnemiesAct.
The 7-justice majority emphasizes that they are not deciding if #Trump's use of the #AlienEnemiesAct is legal 
. But they do make clear that HOW the Trump admin was trying to USE the #law WAS illegal - a very clear violation of DueProcess.
They remand to the #5thCircuit to develop a new test.
#law #immigration #Rendition #StateSponsoredAbduction #Constitution #CivilRights #HumanRights #Judiciary #SeparationOfPowers #AbuseOfPower
I’ll give you 1 guess who the 2 justices are in dissent.
#SCOTUS recites the facts in detail, making clear that the government was about to deport hundreds of people to #ElSalvador without ANY real opportunity to file #HabeasCorpus lawsuits in challenge, a direct violation of their previous order - & mentions #KilmarAbregoGarcia.
![We understood the Government to assert the right to remove the detainees as soon as midnight central time on April 19. The Government addressed the detainees' allegations on April 18 only at an evening hearing before the District Court for the District of Columbia, where the detainees had separately sought relief. The Government guaranteed that no putative class members would be removed that day. Tr. of Proceedings in J. G. G. v. Trump, No. 25-cv-766, ECF Doc. 93, p. 9. But it further represented that, in its view, removal of putative class members as soon as the next day "would be consistent with" its due process obligations, and it "reserve[d] the right" to take such action. Id., at 26; see id., at 16 (explanation by the court that "tomorrow .. starts at 12:01 a.m."). Evidence now in the record (although not all before us on April 18) suggests that the Government had in fact taken steps on the afternoon of April 18 toward removing detainees under the AEA-including transporting them from their detention facility to an airport and later returning them to the facility. See Supp. App. to Reply 1a-5a. Had the detainees been removed from the United States to the custody of a foreign sovereign on April 19, the Government may have argued, as it has previously argued, that no U. S. court had jurisdiction to order relief. See Application To Vacate Injunction in Noem v. Abrego Garcia, No. 24A949 (Apr. 7, 2025), pp. 11-20.](https://s3.masto.ai/media_attachments/files/114/519/441/979/502/714/original/9f88393c7df4c057.png "We understood the Government to assert the right to remove the detainees as soon as midnight central time on April 19. The Government addressed the detainees' allegations on April 18 only at an evening hearing before the District Court for the District of Columbia, where the detainees had separately sought relief. The Government guaranteed that no putative class members would be removed that day. Tr. of Proceedings in J. G. G. v. Trump, No. 25-cv-766, ECF Doc. 93, p. 9. But it further represented that, in its view, removal of putative class members as soon as the next day \"would be consistent with\" its due process obligations, and it \"reserve[d] the right\" to take such action. Id., at 26; see id., at 16 (explanation by the court that \"tomorrow .. starts at 12:01 a.m.\"). Evidence now in the record (although not all before us on April 18) suggests that the Government had in fact taken steps on the afternoon of April 18 toward removing detainees under the AEA-including transporting them from their detention facility to an airport and later returning them to the facility. See Supp. App. to Reply 1a-5a. Had the detainees been removed from the United States to the custody of a foreign sovereign on April 19, the Government may have argued, as it has previously argued, that no U. S. court had jurisdiction to order relief. See Application To Vacate Injunction in Noem v. Abrego Garcia, No. 24A949 (Apr. 7, 2025), pp. 11-20.")
#SCOTUS also rebukes Judge Hendrix in the Western District of #Texas & the ultra-conservative #FifthCircuit for refusing to act on the #ACLU's emergency request, emphasizing that the facts on the ground showed that planes were set to take off — thus making Judge Hendrix' failure to act an appealable order.
